ClemensCV commited on
Commit
2340db5
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c724176

Limit Dataset Card update to license

Browse files

Restore the current public card content and retain only the approved CC BY 4.0 license update.

Signed-off-by: Clemens Volk <cvolk@nvidia.com>

Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +30 -41
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,20 +1,16 @@
1
  ---
2
  pretty_name: Arena DROID Camera Sensitivity Workflow Sample
3
  license: cc-by-4.0
4
- language:
5
- - en
6
  task_categories:
7
  - robotics
8
  tags:
9
- - other
10
- - tabular
11
  - robotics
12
- - synthetic
13
- - evaluation
14
  - simulation
15
  - policy-evaluation
16
  - sensitivity-analysis
17
  - isaaclab-arena
 
 
18
  size_categories:
19
  - n<1K
20
  ---
@@ -25,15 +21,15 @@ size_categories:
25
 
26
  Arena-DROID-Camera-Sensitivity-Workflow-Sample is a compact set of episode-level results generated by an Isaac Lab-Arena simulation experiment. It lets users run the documented camera sensitivity analysis without first executing the policy-evaluation sweep.
27
 
28
- The experiment evaluates an OpenPI `pi05` policy on a DROID Rubik's-cube pick-and-place task while independently varying the wrist-camera position on three axes. Each JSONL record contains the sampled camera offset, task instruction, episode outcome and length, timestamp, objective progress, and predicate events. The dataset does not contain robot trajectories, actions, observations, images, video, audio, simulation assets, software, or model weights.
29
 
30
  | Dataset version | Records | Successful | Unsuccessful | Data file |
31
  |---|---:|---:|---:|---|
32
  | `arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0` | 10 | 7 | 3 | `episode_results_rebuild0.jsonl` |
33
 
34
- This is a workflow sample. Its size is sufficient to demonstrate the software path, but not to measure policy robustness or compare policy performance. This dataset is ready for commercial or non-commercial uses.
35
 
36
- ## Dataset Owner(s)
37
 
38
  - Owner: NVIDIA Corporation
39
  - Technical contact: [Isaac Lab-Arena maintainers](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/issues)
@@ -44,18 +40,11 @@ This is a workflow sample. Its size is sufficient to demonstrate the software pa
44
  - Simulation run: 2026-08-06
45
  - Hugging Face repository created: 2026-08-07
46
 
47
- ## Versioning
48
-
49
- - Version: `arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0`
50
- - Dataset content commit: `6a879e4b09bc9911453dd8271081dfcf7d3aa9e1`
51
- - Data-file SHA-256: `329a25484c2edc997d74e540b3bfe615a99390270c696c29effb73cc86497ea8`
52
- - Previous version(s): No previous version. This is the initial release of this dataset.
53
-
54
  ## License/Terms of Use
55
 
56
  This dataset is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0).
57
 
58
- ## Intended Usage
59
 
60
  The dataset is intended to:
61
 
@@ -74,7 +63,7 @@ The dataset is not intended for:
74
 
75
  ### Data Collection Method
76
 
77
- **Synthetic.** The records were generated automatically in simulation. No human teleoperation or manual data collection was used during this evaluation run or included in the released payload. This statement does not describe the separate training data used to develop the OpenPI policy.
78
 
79
  The experiment used:
80
 
@@ -89,15 +78,18 @@ The dataset does not include the simulation assets, OpenPI software, or policy w
89
 
90
  ### Labeling Method
91
 
92
- **Automated.** Isaac Lab-Arena generated the `success`, progress, and event values automatically from the task's objective predicates. There are no human-provided labels.
93
 
94
- ## Dataset Format
95
 
96
- - Modality: Tabular
97
- - Format: JSON Lines (JSONL)
98
- - Data file: `episode_results_rebuild0.jsonl`
 
99
 
100
- Each line is one completed episode with 10 top-level fields.
 
 
101
 
102
  | Field | Type | Description |
103
  |---|---|---|
@@ -124,9 +116,8 @@ Hugging Face may present the records as an automatically inferred `train` split.
124
 
125
  ## Dataset Quantification
126
 
127
- - Record count: 10
128
- - Feature count: 10 top-level fields
129
- - Total data storage: 0.0121 MB (12,101 bytes)
130
  - Successful episodes: 7
131
  - Unsuccessful episodes: 3
132
  - Environment IDs: one (`env_id = 0`)
@@ -138,11 +129,11 @@ The released JSONL parses as 10 complete JSON objects. The recorded camera offse
138
 
139
  ## Personal Data and Third-Party Content
140
 
141
- A review of `episode_results_rebuild0.jsonl` at revision `arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0` found no names, email addresses, account identifiers, faces, voices, biometric information, or real-world sensor captures. The file contains experiment identifiers, fixed task text, numeric results, and timestamps without timezone offsets.
142
 
143
- The JSONL contains textual identifiers referring to DROID, OpenPI, and a Rubik's cube. It does not include or redistribute related assets, software, datasets, model weights, logos, images, or product recordings. Isaac Lab-Arena and the OpenPI `pi05` policy stack were generation tools, not included content.
144
 
145
- ## Key Considerations and Limitations
146
 
147
  - Ten episodes are too few for reliable sensitivity, robustness, or performance conclusions.
148
  - All records come from one task, policy variant, seed, and simulation configuration.
@@ -150,7 +141,7 @@ The JSONL contains textual identifiers referring to DROID, OpenPI, and a Rubik's
150
  - Outcomes depend on the task predicates and thresholds used by the recorded workflow.
151
  - Simulation results do not establish real-world robot behavior or safety.
152
  - The timestamps do not include an explicit timezone offset.
153
- - The JSONL does not identify the exact OpenPI model checkpoint or software commit used to generate the run.
154
  - The downloadable sample has a `0.7` success rate. Metrics shown for other runs in the workflow documentation do not describe this file.
155
 
156
  ## Download and Use
@@ -167,19 +158,17 @@ hf download \
167
 
168
  Follow the [Isaac Lab-Arena sensitivity-analysis workflow](https://isaac-sim.github.io/IsaacLab-Arena/main/pages/example_workflows/sensitivity_analysis/sensitivity_analysis.html) to generate the example posterior report.
169
 
170
- ## Reference(s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
171
 
172
  - [Dataset repository](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/Arena-DROID-Camera-Sensitivity-Workflow-Sample)
173
  - [Pinned dataset revision](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/Arena-DROID-Camera-Sensitivity-Workflow-Sample/tree/arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0)
174
  - [Isaac Lab-Arena repository](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena)
175
- - [Isaac Lab-Arena introduction pull request](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/pull/1055)
176
- - [Generation tool: OpenPI repository](https://github.com/Physical-Intelligence/openpi)
177
- - [Sensitivity-analysis workflow](https://isaac-sim.github.io/IsaacLab-Arena/main/pages/example_workflows/sensitivity_analysis/sensitivity_analysis.html)
178
  - [Sensitivity-analysis workflow source](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/blob/main/docs/pages/example_workflows/sensitivity_analysis/sensitivity_analysis.rst)
179
  - [Experiment configuration](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/blob/main/isaaclab_arena_environments/experiment_configs/droid_pnp_camera_sensitivity_openpi_experiment.yaml)
180
-
181
- ## Ethical Considerations
182
-
183
- NVIDIA believes Trustworthy AI is a shared responsibility and we have established policies and practices to enable development for a wide array of AI applications. Developers should work with their internal developer teams to ensure this dataset meets requirements for the relevant industry and use case and addresses unforeseen product misuse.
184
-
185
- Please report quality, risk, security vulnerabilities or NVIDIA AI Concerns [here](https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/support/submit-security-vulnerability/).
 
1
  ---
2
  pretty_name: Arena DROID Camera Sensitivity Workflow Sample
3
  license: cc-by-4.0
 
 
4
  task_categories:
5
  - robotics
6
  tags:
 
 
7
  - robotics
 
 
8
  - simulation
9
  - policy-evaluation
10
  - sensitivity-analysis
11
  - isaaclab-arena
12
+ language:
13
+ - en
14
  size_categories:
15
  - n<1K
16
  ---
 
21
 
22
  Arena-DROID-Camera-Sensitivity-Workflow-Sample is a compact set of episode-level results generated by an Isaac Lab-Arena simulation experiment. It lets users run the documented camera sensitivity analysis without first executing the policy-evaluation sweep.
23
 
24
+ The experiment evaluates an OpenPI `pi05` policy on a DROID Rubik's-cube pick-and-place task while independently varying the wrist-camera position on three axes. Each JSONL record contains the sampled camera offset, task instruction, episode outcome and length, timestamp, objective progress, and predicate events. The dataset does not contain robot trajectories, actions, observations, images, video, audio, or model weights.
25
 
26
  | Dataset version | Records | Successful | Unsuccessful | Data file |
27
  |---|---:|---:|---:|---|
28
  | `arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0` | 10 | 7 | 3 | `episode_results_rebuild0.jsonl` |
29
 
30
+ This is a workflow sample. Its size is sufficient to demonstrate the software path, but not to measure policy robustness or compare policy performance.
31
 
32
+ ## Dataset Owner
33
 
34
  - Owner: NVIDIA Corporation
35
  - Technical contact: [Isaac Lab-Arena maintainers](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/issues)
 
40
  - Simulation run: 2026-08-06
41
  - Hugging Face repository created: 2026-08-07
42
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43
  ## License/Terms of Use
44
 
45
  This dataset is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0).
46
 
47
+ ## Intended Use
48
 
49
  The dataset is intended to:
50
 
 
63
 
64
  ### Data Collection Method
65
 
66
+ The records were generated automatically in simulation. No human teleoperation or manual annotation was used during this evaluation run or included in the released payload. This statement does not describe the separate training data used to develop the OpenPI policy.
67
 
68
  The experiment used:
69
 
 
78
 
79
  ### Labeling Method
80
 
81
+ Isaac Lab-Arena generated the `success`, progress, and event values automatically from the task's objective predicates. There are no human-provided labels.
82
 
83
+ ### Version and Provenance
84
 
85
+ - Dataset revision: `arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0`
86
+ - Dataset content commit: `6a879e4b09bc9911453dd8271081dfcf7d3aa9e1`
87
+ - Data-file SHA-256: `329a25484c2edc997d74e540b3bfe615a99390270c696c29effb73cc86497ea8`
88
+ - Isaac Lab-Arena introduction: [pull request 1055](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/pull/1055)
89
 
90
+ ## Dataset Format
91
+
92
+ The dataset contains one newline-delimited JSON file, `episode_results_rebuild0.jsonl`. Each line is one completed episode.
93
 
94
  | Field | Type | Description |
95
  |---|---|---|
 
116
 
117
  ## Dataset Quantification
118
 
119
+ - JSONL records: 10
120
+ - Data-file size: 12,101 bytes
 
121
  - Successful episodes: 7
122
  - Unsuccessful episodes: 3
123
  - Environment IDs: one (`env_id = 0`)
 
129
 
130
  ## Personal Data and Third-Party Content
131
 
132
+ A review of `episode_results_rebuild0.jsonl` at revision `arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0` found no names, email addresses, account identifiers, faces, voices, or real-world sensor captures. The file contains experiment identifiers, fixed task text, numeric results, and timestamps without timezone offsets.
133
 
134
+ The JSONL contains textual identifiers referring to DROID, OpenPI, and a Rubik's cube. It does not include or redistribute related assets, software, or model weights.
135
 
136
+ ## Limitations
137
 
138
  - Ten episodes are too few for reliable sensitivity, robustness, or performance conclusions.
139
  - All records come from one task, policy variant, seed, and simulation configuration.
 
141
  - Outcomes depend on the task predicates and thresholds used by the recorded workflow.
142
  - Simulation results do not establish real-world robot behavior or safety.
143
  - The timestamps do not include an explicit timezone offset.
144
+ - The JSONL does not identify the exact OpenPI model or software commit used to generate the run.
145
  - The downloadable sample has a `0.7` success rate. Metrics shown for other runs in the workflow documentation do not describe this file.
146
 
147
  ## Download and Use
 
158
 
159
  Follow the [Isaac Lab-Arena sensitivity-analysis workflow](https://isaac-sim.github.io/IsaacLab-Arena/main/pages/example_workflows/sensitivity_analysis/sensitivity_analysis.html) to generate the example posterior report.
160
 
161
+ ## Ethical Considerations
162
+
163
+ NVIDIA believes Trustworthy AI is a shared responsibility and has established policies and practices to support the development of AI applications. Users should evaluate whether this dataset and the surrounding workflow are appropriate for their use case and should not treat this small simulation sample as evidence of safe or effective deployment.
164
+
165
+ Please report security vulnerabilities or NVIDIA AI concerns through the [NVIDIA Product Security reporting page](https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/support/submit-security-vulnerability/).
166
+
167
+ ## References
168
 
169
  - [Dataset repository](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/Arena-DROID-Camera-Sensitivity-Workflow-Sample)
170
  - [Pinned dataset revision](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/Arena-DROID-Camera-Sensitivity-Workflow-Sample/tree/arena_v0.2_lab_v3.0)
171
  - [Isaac Lab-Arena repository](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena)
172
+ - [OpenPI repository](https://github.com/Physical-Intelligence/openpi)
 
 
173
  - [Sensitivity-analysis workflow source](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/blob/main/docs/pages/example_workflows/sensitivity_analysis/sensitivity_analysis.rst)
174
  - [Experiment configuration](https://github.com/isaac-sim/IsaacLab-Arena/blob/main/isaaclab_arena_environments/experiment_configs/droid_pnp_camera_sensitivity_openpi_experiment.yaml)