WeaveBench: A Long-Horizon, Real-World Benchmark for Computer-Use Agents with Hybrid Interfaces
Abstract
WeaveBench presents a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating computer-use agents across multiple interfaces, revealing significant challenges in long-horizon task orchestration and highlighting the limitations of traditional performance assessment methods.
Computer-use agents (CUAs) increasingly operate in runtimes that combine visual desktop control, command-line execution, code editing, browsers, and external tools. Existing benchmarks, however, often evaluate these interfaces as separable capabilities, leaving long-horizon cross-interface orchestration under-tested. Thus, we introduce WeaveBench, a long-horizon hybrid-interface benchmark with 114 tasks across 8 real-world work domains, grounded in real user requests and publicly verifiable artifacts. Each task requires agents to combine GUI observations/actions with CLI/code operations within a single trajectory. We evaluate these tasks on a real Ubuntu desktop inside deployed CLI-agent runtimes, augmented with a minimal desktop-control plugin. We also propose a companion trajectory-aware judge that inspects deliverables, files, screenshots, logs, and action traces, while detecting shortcut behaviors such as fabricated visual evidence or hard-coded metrics. Across frontier model-runtime pairings, the best PassRate reaches only 41.2%, showing the benchmark remains far from saturated. The trajectory-aware judge further reveals that outcome-only grading substantially overestimates agent performance. Overall, WeaveBench exposes a critical gap in CUA evaluation and provides an effective testbed to measure whether agents can orchestrate GUI, CLI, and code operations across long-horizon real-world tasks.
Community
We introduce WeaveBench, a long-horizon benchmark with 114 tasks across 8 real-world domains, where agents must interleave GUI and CLI/code operations in a single trajectory on a real Ubuntu desktop. The best frontier model reaches only 41.2% PassRate, and our trajectory-aware judge shows outcome-only grading greatly overestimates agent performance. Project: https://weavebench.github.io
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World, Long-Horizon Agent Evaluation (2026)
- OpenComputer: Verifiable Software Worlds for Computer-Use Agents (2026)
- AgenticVBench: Can AI Agents Complete Real-World Post-Production Tasks? (2026)
- SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work? (2026)
- Claw-Eval-Live: A Live Agent Benchmark for Evolving Real-World Workflows (2026)
- TOBench: A Task-Oriented Omni-Modal Benchmark for Real-World Tool-Using Agents (2026)
- Agents'Last Exam (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.09426 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper