uid
stringclasses
122 values
premise
stringclasses
121 values
hypothesis
stringclasses
122 values
chaos_dist
listlengths
3
3
mnli_labels
listlengths
1
5
worker_id
stringclasses
48 values
multilabel
listlengths
1
3
explanation
stringlengths
48
773
highlight_p
listlengths
0
12
highlight_h
listlengths
0
9
dist
listlengths
3
3
agg_dist
listlengths
3
3
taxonomy
listlengths
1
3
within_label_variation
stringclasses
3 values
71888n
yeah okay you go ahead
Maybe you can go ahead.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 1, 0 ]
w46
[ 2 ]
The statement could be either true or false depending on who ends up going ahead. It could go either way, and there's really not enough context here to make a clear distinction.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 13, "text": "you", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 22, "text": "go ahead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 22, "text": "you can go ahead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 0 ]
null
71888n
yeah okay you go ahead
Maybe you can go ahead.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 1, 0 ]
w6
[ 2 ]
The use of the word "maybe" makes the statement indefinite.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 4, "text": "yeah", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 5, "endIndex": 9, "text": "okay", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Maybe", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 0 ]
null
71888n
yeah okay you go ahead
Maybe you can go ahead.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 1, 0 ]
w7
[ 0, 2 ]
The context is someone giving permission for someone to go ahead, but it is not clear whether or not the person getting permission is actually able to go ahead. It is mostly likey that if someone is giving permission, then the one getting permission is able to go ahead, but it is not necessarily true.
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 22, "text": "go ahead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Maybe", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 0 ]
null
71888n
yeah okay you go ahead
Maybe you can go ahead.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 2, 0, 1, 0 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
Both the context and statement are saying that you can go ahead.
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 22, "text": "you go ahead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 22, "text": "you can go ahead", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.5, 0.4000000059604645, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 0 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w16
[ 2 ]
This context and statement are hard to classify because while the context says 'No North Caroline State' it doesn't state that the state doesn't exist.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "There is no", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w19
[ 1 ]
The context reads North Carolina State with a capital "S" which could refer to a college or other organization. The statement uses a lower case "s" and refers to the state of North Carolina, a geographic entity different from a proper noun college or organization.
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "State", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 17, "text": "state", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w2
[ 0 ]
Although the context is an incomplete sentence, the statement matches the intent identically.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 8, "text": "North", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 17, "text": "Carolina", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "State", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 11, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 17, "text": "state", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 24, "text": "called", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 31, "endIndex": 39, "text": "Carolina", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 30, "text": "North", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w25
[ 2, 1 ]
North Carolina has been a state since 1789, but there was a time when that land was not part of the United States and was free and indigenous territory. It is false because there is a state called North Carolina.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 24, "text": "no state called", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w28
[ 2 ]
The context is not a full sentence, so it is difficult to decide whether the statement would mean. If the context refers to the existence of North Carolina, then the statement would be true. If the context refers to any other aspect of the state, then the statement would be false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 24, "text": "no state called", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w30
[ 1 ]
It is a fact that there is a state called North Carolina. As State was capitalized, it was probably referring to a university, not a state.
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 23, "text": "State", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 39, "text": "no state called North Carolina", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w39
[ 2 ]
"North Carolina State" seems to be referring to a college by that name, not referencing the state of North Carolina at all. Common knowledge says there IS a state called North Carolina, but there may or may not be a "North Carolina State" college within it.
[ { "startIndex": 3, "endIndex": 23, "text": "North Carolina State", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 17, "text": "state", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
This depends entirely on how you interpret the context. If it means North Carolina is excluded, the statement does not follow. If it means North Carolina doesn't exist, than the statement is therefore true.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 24, "text": "no state called", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The context of no North Carolina State could have multiple meanings, only one possibility being the statement that there is no state called North Carolina. It could also possibly mean that there is no North Carolina representation in a place, for example.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 2, "text": "no", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 18, "endIndex": 24, "text": "called", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
73518e
no North Carolina State
There is no state called North Carolina
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 0, 2, 2, 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
The context was possibly truncated so the statement shouldn't assume the full context and is most likely false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 23, "text": "no North Carolina State", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 39, "text": "no state called North Carolina", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.10000000149011612, 0.550000011920929, 0.3499999940395355 ]
[ 8, 7 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
The statement contradicts the context. In the context, it states that Wallace won his last race for governor, but the statement claims that he was not reelected.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 34, "text": "Wallace won his last race", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 25, "text": "not reelected", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context indicates that Wallace won his last race, implying he was reelected, which is contrary to the statement indicating he was not reelected.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 20, "text": "won", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 29, "text": "last", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 16, "endIndex": 25, "text": "reelected", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 15, "text": "not", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w13
[ 1 ]
Based on the year of the context, 1982, we know that Wallace did receive enough votes to return to the governorship. The statement could be referring to another election year.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 47, "text": "In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 25, "text": "not reelected", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 29, "endIndex": 37, "text": "governor", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 28, "text": "as", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w16
[ 1 ]
The statement contradics the statement, that says Wallace was not reelected as governor and he was, he won in 1982 according to the context.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 47, "text": "In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 37, "text": "Wallace was not reelected as governor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w4
[ 0, 1 ]
The truth of the statement all depends on what time period it refers to. If it refers to the 1982 election referenced in the context than the statement is false since the context claims he won the race. If it's referring to the period after him winning the 82 elections, then it's true.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 34, "text": "won his last race", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 25, "text": "not reelected", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0, 0.5 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
The context states that Wallace was reelected as Governor, which would make the statement that says that he lost false.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 20, "text": "Wallace won", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "was not reelected", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context refers to Wallace winning his last race. Last seems to refer to a reelection. No time period is referred to in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 112, "text": "In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w7
[ 2 ]
The fact that Wallace won his last race does not mean that he was reelected.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 34, "text": "won his last race", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "was not reelected", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
Wallace was reelected as governor in his last race in 1982.
[ { "startIndex": 9, "endIndex": 47, "text": "Wallace won his last race for governor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 37, "text": "not reelected as governor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
7449c
In 1982, Wallace won his last race for governor with a quarter of the black votes cast in the Democratic primary, a fact alluded to in a written epilogue at the end of the film.
Wallace was not reelected as governor.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
He won his last race as governor, which means he was not re-elected.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 47, "text": "won his last race for governor", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 38, "text": "Wallace was not reelected as governor.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.15000000596046448, 0.10000000149011612, 0.75 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
These two sentences could not be further contradicting from one another. The context portrays the Hindus as violently attacking the Sikhs while the statement paints them as peaceful protestors.
[ { "startIndex": 17, "endIndex": 31, "text": "on the rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 71, "endIndex": 100, "text": "a round of communal violence.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w1
[ 1 ]
The context and statement conflict because the context notes the Hindus were violent while the statement indicates they were peaceful. Thus the statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 91, "endIndex": 99, "text": "violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w10
[ 1 ]
The context explains that violence took place, so this was not peaceful.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 99, "text": "communal violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 31, "text": "Hindus peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w11
[ 1 ]
The context talks about violence while the statement talks about peaceful protest.
[ { "startIndex": 73, "endIndex": 99, "text": "round of communal violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w12
[ 1 ]
Going on a rampage and communal violence are words that mean the opposite of peacefully protesting. Neither of these things would be classified as peaceful actions.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 31, "text": "went on the rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 100, "text": "communal violence.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w13
[ 2, 1 ]
A peaceful protest might have been held prior to the rampage but we cannot be certain this is true, and in fact, is unlikely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 31, "text": "went on the rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 56, "text": "through Sikh communities", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w14
[ 1 ]
If they went on a rampage of violence, they can't also be considered peaceful.
[ { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 100, "text": "resulting in a round of communal violence.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w16
[ 1 ]
Rampage' in the context and 'peacefully protested' in the statement, contradict themselves.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 56, "text": "went on the rampage through Sikh communities", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 49, "text": "peacefully protested against the Sikhs", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w18
[ 1 ]
If the Hindus went on a rampage against the Sikhs and used violence against them, it does not follow that the Hindus used peaceful protests against the Sikhs, as that is the exacyt opposite form of protest.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 56, "text": "rampage through Sikh communities", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 100, "text": "communal violence.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 43, "text": "protested against the", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w19
[ 1 ]
The context says that Hindus went on a rampage, which resulted in violence. Violence is the opposite of peace, so the statement that Hindus protested peacefully is likely to be false.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 10, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w2
[ 1 ]
The statement contradicts the context by using the term "peacefully protested" instead of "rampage" and "violence" which are opposites of peace.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 91, "endIndex": 99, "text": "violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 31, "text": "protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w20
[ 1 ]
A rampage is defined as "(especially of a large group of people) rush around in a violent and uncontrollable manner." This is the complete opposite of a peaceful protest.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w21
[ 1 ]
The first sentence contradicts the second; if the Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs, then they also cannot have gone on a violent rampage.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 99, "text": "communal violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w22
[ 1 ]
It is not peaceful to go on a rampage or conduct violence.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 91, "endIndex": 99, "text": "violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w26
[ 1 ]
The context and statement are implying opposite things happened; going on a rampage and causing violence cannot align with peaceful protesting.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 100, "text": "communal violence.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 10, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w27
[ 1 ]
While both statement and context talk about their interference with the Sikhs, the statement's mention of a peaceful protest contradicts the context's mention of a violent rampage
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 6, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 44, "text": "Sikh", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 91, "endIndex": 99, "text": "violence", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 4, "endIndex": 10, "text": "Hindus", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 49, "text": "against the Sikhs", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 22, "endIndex": 31, "text": "protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w3
[ 1 ]
Context emphasizes the Hindus and Sikh were at odds and resulted in violence between the two. the statement emphasizes a peaceful protest. peace is without violence so statement is false.
[ { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 99, "text": "communal violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w4
[ 1 ]
Rampaging, as per the context, implies a whole lot more than just peaceful protest.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 21, "text": "peacefully", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w5
[ 1 ]
The context describes "rampage" and therefore violence, whereas the statement describes peace. This makes the statement false.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 31, "text": "went on the rampage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The rampage and communal violence in the context is the opposite of the peaceful action referred to in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 100, "text": "Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w7
[ 1 ]
The Hindus went on a rampage, meaning that they were not peacefully protesting.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 31, "text": "went on the rampage", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w8
[ 1 ]
The Hindus did not peacefully protest against the Sikhs but instead went on a rampage that resulted in communal violence so this statement would be false.
[ { "startIndex": 24, "endIndex": 31, "text": "rampage", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 82, "endIndex": 99, "text": "communal violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 31, "text": "peacefully protested", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
75084c
Hindus then went on the rampage through Sikh communities, resulting in a round of communal violence.
The Hindus peacefully protested against the Sikhs.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 0 ]
w9
[ 1 ]
The Hindus went according to the context. A rampage does not imply peaceful protesting. This is why the statement is likely untrue.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 56, "text": "went on the rampage through Sikh communities", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 99, "text": "resulting in a round of communal violence", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 32, "endIndex": 49, "text": "against the Sikhs", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0, 0.021739130839705467, 0.97826087474823 ]
[ 3 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The context notes that the three items are often the case today, so it is likely true that they are all cases today.
[ { "startIndex": 97, "endIndex": 102, "text": "today", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 92, "endIndex": 96, "text": "case", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 19, "text": "cases", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 25, "text": "today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w16
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement is very vague in regards to the context, but I'm leaning toward the statement being most likely to be true because seems like the statement unifies 'passage of time, rate of inflation and geographic location' as being cases today.
[ { "startIndex": 76, "endIndex": 102, "text": "so often is the case today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 25, "text": "These are all cases today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w18
[ 0 ]
The clause, "as is so often is the case today," indicated that the aforementioned items in a series are all taking place today making the statement following it likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 73, "endIndex": 102, "text": "as so often is the case today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 25, "text": "are all cases today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w19
[ 0 ]
The context indicates several conditions that characterize today. The statement says a vague "these" are all cases today. Since these likely refers to conditions described above, the statement is likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 24, "text": "time", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 38, "endIndex": 47, "text": "inflation", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 52, "endIndex": 71, "text": "geographic location", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 92, "endIndex": 96, "text": "case", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "These", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 25, "text": "cases today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
The context doesn't make any sense as is, therefore it's hard for the statement to be either true or false. In this case, the entire sentence is needed for the context to be able to judge the statement, as it stands these two seem wholly unrelated.
[ { "startIndex": 88, "endIndex": 102, "text": "the case today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 19, "text": "all cases", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w5
[ 0 ]
The statement is wrapping up the context, of all different cases that exist in modern times (it seems).
[ { "startIndex": 88, "endIndex": 102, "text": "the case today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 25, "text": "cases today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w6
[ 1 ]
The context refers to so often which is less than or not equal to the all in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 73, "endIndex": 103, "text": "as so often is the case today.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w7
[ 0 ]
The context lists these things as things that are the case today, and the statement also says they are the case today.
[ { "startIndex": 85, "endIndex": 103, "text": "is the case today.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 26, "text": "cases today.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
These are the cases of today which was listed in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 92, "endIndex": 102, "text": "case today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 25, "text": "cases today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
81938n
than the passage of time, the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today.
These are all cases today.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 ]
w9
[ 2 ]
This is can be either true or false because there could be more cases, that is, some that are not mentioned in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 26, "endIndex": 102, "text": "the rate of inflation, or geographic location, as so often is the case today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 10, "endIndex": 25, "text": "all cases today", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.6499999761581421, 0.25, 0.10000000149011612 ]
[ 8, 1 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w0
[ 2 ]
The context is not stating an opinion that Slate "should" make an effort to uncover the truth. It is simply stating a fact, that Slate has not taken any action to do so.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 25, "text": "I think it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 27, "text": "should make an effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
Taking this action to uncover the truth would help its effort for the public-opinion industry based on the context.
[ { "startIndex": 34, "endIndex": 40, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 90, "text": "make", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 124, "endIndex": 129, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 17, "text": "make", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 27, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 45, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w10
[ 0 ]
The context says it would be in the best interest of Slate to uncover the trith, so this statement is likely true.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 25, "text": "behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 129, "text": "make a thorough effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 45, "text": "make an effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w12
[ 2 ]
The speaker in the context clearly believes that Slate should make an effort, but that's just an opinion, and it may be objectively good or bad for Slate to do so. It may be a waste of time or resources, or it may be beneficial.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 19, "text": "I think it behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w13
[ 0 ]
Uncovering the truth will help Slate receive positive public opinion.
[ { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 72, "text": "public-opinion", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w14
[ 0 ]
If the context is true, then Slate should follow it.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 25, "text": "behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 108, "text": "make a thorough effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 46, "text": "uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w15
[ 0 ]
The context tells Slate to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth. The statement also says Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 129, "text": "effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 46, "text": "effort uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w16
[ 0 ]
The context states that Slate is making an effort to uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 129, "text": "effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 25, "text": "Slate", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 45, "text": "effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Slate", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w17
[ 0 ]
Behooves means it is a duty or responsibility of someone to do something. Having a duty to do something is the same as saying that one should do something.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w18
[ 0 ]
If Slate wants to be a purveyor of truthful information that will influence their readers, they should investigate the veracity of their claims.
[ { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 81, "text": "take over the public-opinion industry", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 46, "text": "make an effort uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w19
[ 0 ]
If Slate makes an effort to uncover the truth generally, then it should also be able to uncover the truth about this unnatural connection.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 108, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 124, "endIndex": 129, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 119, "text": "uncover", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 27, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 35, "text": "uncover", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 45, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w2
[ 0 ]
Both the context and the statement address Slate's effort to uncovering the truth. The word "behooves" is similar to "should", where as the truth is the duty of Slate.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 119, "text": "uncover", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 124, "endIndex": 129, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 108, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 27, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 35, "text": "uncover", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 45, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w20
[ 0 ]
To behoove would mean Slate has this duty and responsibility to uncover the truth which lines up with making that effort to uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 108, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 27, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w21
[ 0 ]
Slate is being recommended to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth, which is another way of saying Slate should make this effort.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 83, "endIndex": 129, "text": "to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Slate should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 45, "text": "make an effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w22
[ 2 ]
The statement sounds like an opinion, so it is not necessarily either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w25
[ 2 ]
Slate may need to make a specific effort, but the context implies that investigation is necessary to sway an audience. The statement "uncover the truth" implies there is falsehood, but there is no backing for that claim provided.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 72, "text": "take over the public-opinion", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 142, "endIndex": 162, "text": "unnatural connection", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w26
[ 0 ]
In the context, it says it would behoove, or benefit Slate to uncover the truth, implying Slate should, as it says in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 108, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 27, "text": "effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 46, "text": "uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w27
[ 0 ]
Since the first sentence says, "It behooves Slate" to do ___ it would make sense that Slate should do ____. Both sentences indicate that Slate should find out the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w28
[ 0 ]
The sections of the context "behooves Slate" and "make a thorough effort to uncover the truth" mean the same thing as the entire statement.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 25, "text": "behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 129, "text": "make a thorough effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 45, "text": "make an effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w29
[ 2 ]
These are both opinions, and both sentences are saying the same thing. The first sentence says exactly the same thing but in an expanded format. I think it behooves Slate and Slate should make an effort point to an opinion. If Slate is in the public-opinion industry, they are not doing hard journalism.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 26, "text": "I think it behooves Slate,", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 65, "endIndex": 72, "text": "opinion", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 27, "text": "should make an effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w3
[ 0, 2 ]
Context and statement both state that Slate should make an effort to uncover the truth. However, statement doesn't state what truth they are referring to. Most likely it's the truth behind the unnatural connection but cannot make assumptions.
[ { "startIndex": 124, "endIndex": 162, "text": "truth behind this unnatural connection", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 46, "text": "uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w30
[ 0, 2 ]
"I think" expresses an opinion, which could be incorrect. So while it is true that possibly Slate should uncover the truth, perhaps they shouldn't. Although it is likely that they should.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 7, "text": "I think", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w31
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement could be true because the statement is about how Slate should uncover the truth and the context states it would behoove Slate to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind some specific "unnatural connection" that the reader isn't privy to. This statement can also be true or false because the statement is very general and may not refer to the "unnatural connection" in the context.
[ { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w35
[ 0, 2 ]
In the content, the protagonist believes that Slate (proper noun, likely a company name) should uncover the truth about a referenced connection (which we don't have additional information about). In the statement, it's declared that Slate (proper noun, likely a company name) should make an effort to uncover the truth, which may or may not include truth about the previously referenced connection. Truth is vaguely specified in both sentence. Truth in the statement may be a subset of truth involved in the "unnatural connection", but the opposite might be true as well; truth in the context may merely be a subset of the whole universal truth. It isn't likely that the statement implies universal truth, since that is rarely the case in every day philosophy/linguistics.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 109, "endIndex": 129, "text": "to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 45, "text": "make an effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w37
[ 0 ]
Making an effort to uncover the truth is the same as making a thorough effort to uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 129, "text": "make a thorough effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 13, "endIndex": 45, "text": "make an effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w38
[ 0, 2 ]
The statement could be true since if it behooves Slate, then logically slate will benefit from it and therefore should make an effort to uncover the truth. The statement could be either true or false as it seems to be a question of opinion and opinions can be biased. The author thinks it behooves Slate but perhaps in reality Slate is of a different opinion.
[ { "startIndex": 2, "endIndex": 7, "text": "think", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w39
[ 0 ]
The sentence implies that Slate is making efforts, and that it would benefit them to uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w4
[ 2 ]
Just because the author believes Slate should do something, it does not mean that Slate actually should do so.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 25, "text": "I think it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 12, "text": "Slate should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 1, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w40
[ 0 ]
If it behooves Slate, then it is likely true that they should make an effort to uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w42
[ 0, 2 ]
The context suggests that Slate should uncover the truth in order to achieve its goal. The statement says that SLate should try to uncover the truth which means it is likely to happen but it wont happen necessarily.
[ { "startIndex": 20, "endIndex": 25, "text": "Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 129, "text": "effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 5, "text": "Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w45
[ 2, 1 ]
We do not know who the "I" is in this case and that person is suggesting what is best for a magazine company to take action on. The "I think it behooves" statement is what makes this a personal 'should' statement. Truth is often seen as a definitive among certain groups like in religion, but not in the sciences or industry. Truth is arguably adjacent in meaning to Facts. So, we have a dichotomy of opinion and facts within the context. There is no prove as to whether theses are opposing forces or not. We also don't what area the truth is potentially being sought. Based on these thoughts, this statement leans false as the context meddles with opinion vs. fact.
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 19, "text": "I think it behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 72, "text": "public-opinion", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0.5, 0.5 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w46
[ 0 ]
Discovering the truth is generally a good practice someone should strive for.
[ { "startIndex": 58, "endIndex": 72, "text": "public-opinion", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 124, "endIndex": 129, "text": "truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 46, "text": "truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w47
[ 0 ]
While Slate is putting effort towards taking over the public-opinion industry, they SHOULD uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 44, "endIndex": 81, "text": "take over the public-opinion industry", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 93, "endIndex": 129, "text": "thorough effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 45, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w5
[ 0, 2 ]
Both sentences suggest the state should "uncover the truth," which translates to me that there is, in fact, a truth to be uncovered. However, there is no inclination that the slate will uncover the truth or not in an effort to take over the public-opinion industry, which is why I picked can be either true or false.
[ { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 86, "endIndex": 108, "text": "make a thorough effort", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 27, "text": "should make an effort", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 28, "endIndex": 46, "text": "uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w6
[ 0 ]
The statement affirms the context. The use of the word behooves affirms Slate's responsibility.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 109, "endIndex": 129, "text": "to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 46, "text": "Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w7
[ 0 ]
The statement says that it behooves Slate to uncover the truth, so if this is true, then it can be also understood that they should uncover the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 11, "endIndex": 19, "text": "behooves", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 112, "endIndex": 129, "text": "uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w8
[ 0 ]
In the context Slate should make a thorough effort to uncover the truth and the statement also says that it should make an effort to uncover the truth so it is most likely to be true.
[ { "startIndex": 102, "endIndex": 129, "text": "effort to uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 45, "text": "effort uncover the truth", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
88349e
I think it behooves Slate, in its effort to take over the public-opinion industry, to make a thorough effort to uncover the truth behind this unnatural connection.
Slate should make an effort uncover the truth.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1 ]
w9
[ 0 ]
To say it 'behooves' means that it is Slate's duty to uncover the truth in this context. Slate is a news magazine among other things. It makes sense that they must do what they can to find the truth.
[ { "startIndex": 8, "endIndex": 25, "text": "it behooves Slate", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 6, "endIndex": 12, "text": "should", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.7236841917037964, 0.2631579041481018, 0.013157890178263187 ]
[ 4 ]
null
91601e
Even today, Yanomamo men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women for procreative purposes.
Yanomamo is a terrorist.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w6
[ 0, 2 ]
Raiding, killing, and abducting for procreation can be synonymous with terrorism. There is no mention of Yanomamo women in the context so the context may be slightly more ambiguous than the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 91, "text": "Yanomamo men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women for procreative purposes", "type": "highlight" } ]
[]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.25, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1, 7 ]
coref
91601e
Even today, Yanomamo men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women for procreative purposes.
Yanomamo is a terrorist.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w7
[ 0, 2 ]
The context describes men acting out terrorist activity, but the sentence words the name of the area as if it is a person. If it it referring to the men of the area, then it agrees with the context.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 24, "text": "Yanomamo men", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 8, "text": "Yanomamo", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0.5, 0.5, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.25, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1, 7 ]
coref
91601e
Even today, Yanomamo men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women for procreative purposes.
Yanomamo is a terrorist.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w0
[ 1 ]
Yanomamo is used in the statement as an indicator of a town name. It does not say "Yanomamo's men" it says, "Yanomamo men" There is no proof that Yanomamo is a real person.
[ { "startIndex": 12, "endIndex": 24, "text": "Yanomamo men", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 0, "endIndex": 11, "text": "Yanomamo is", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 0, 0, 1 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.25, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1, 7 ]
null
91601e
Even today, Yanomamo men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women for procreative purposes.
Yanomamo is a terrorist.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w1
[ 0 ]
The fact that Yanomamo's men are terrorizing villages in the context implies that he is a terrorist as indicated in the statement.
[ { "startIndex": 25, "endIndex": 29, "text": "raid", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 40, "endIndex": 44, "text": "kill", "type": "highlight" }, { "startIndex": 54, "endIndex": 60, "text": "abduct", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 23, "text": "terrorist", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.25, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1, 7 ]
null
91601e
Even today, Yanomamo men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women for procreative purposes.
Yanomamo is a terrorist.
[ 0, 0, 0 ]
[ 1, 2, 0, 1, 2 ]
w11
[ 0 ]
The context talks about the person doing violent things and killing people and the statement calls the person a terrorist which is accurate.
[ { "startIndex": 21, "endIndex": 66, "text": "men raid villages, kill men, and abduct women", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ { "startIndex": 14, "endIndex": 23, "text": "terrorist", "type": "highlight" } ]
[ 1, 0, 0 ]
[ 0.550000011920929, 0.25, 0.20000000298023224 ]
[ 1, 7 ]
null